Notes on Chapter 8 (Integration on Product Spaces) of Walter Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis.

This chapter is primarily concerned with Fubini's theorem and some of its applications. We begin with some preliminaries.

Preliminaries

Measurability on Cartesian Products

Let (X,S)(X, \mathscr{S}), (Y,T)(Y, \mathscr{T}) be measurable spaces.

A couple of definitions:

  • A measurable rectangle is a set of the form A×BA\times B with both AA and BB measurable.
  • The class E\mathscr{E} of elementary sets consists of all finite unions of disjoint measurable rectangles.
  • S×T\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} is the smallest σ\sigma-algebra in X×YX\times Y which contains every measurable rectangle.
  • A monotone class M\mathfrak{M} is a collection of sets such that if AiMA_i\in\mathfrak{M} and AiAi+1A_i\subset A_{i+1}, then the countable union of the AiA_i is in M\mathfrak{M}, and where the opposite is true for the intersection of a descending chain of sets.
  • If EX×YE\subset X\times Y, define the x- and y-section Ex={y:(x,y)E},Ey={x:(x,y)E}.E_x=\{y:(x,y)\in E\},\qquad E^y=\{x:(x,y)\in E\}.
  • If f:X×YZf: X\times Y\rightarrow Z, define fx(y)=f(x,y)=fy(x)f_x(y) = f(x, y) = f^y(x).

We can prove a few basic facts:

Facts about products:

  1. If ES×TE\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} then ExTE_x\in\mathscr{T} and EySE^y\in\mathscr{S} for any xXx\in X and yYy\in Y.
  2. S×T\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} is the smallest monotone class which contains E\mathscr{E}.
  3. If ff is (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})-measurable then fxf_x is T\mathscr{T}-measurable and fyf^y is S\mathscr{S}-measurable for any xXx\in X and yYy\in Y.

Product Measures

We use the following theorem to justify our definition of product measures:

Well-definedness of product measures: Let (X,S,μ)(X,\mathscr{S},\mu) and (Y,T,λ)(Y,\mathscr{T},\lambda) be σ\sigma-finite measure spaces. Suppose QS×TQ\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T}. Define φ(x)=λ(Qx),ψ(y)=μ(Qy)\varphi(x)=\lambda(Q_x),\qquad \psi(y)=\mu(Q^y) then φ\varphi is S\mathscr{S}-measurable, ψ\psi is T\mathscr{T}-measurable, and Xφ dμ=Yψ dλ.\int_X\varphi\ d\mu = \int_Y\psi\ d\lambda.

We show this by setting Ω\Omega to be the class of all QS×TQ\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} that satisfy the conclusion of the theorem. Let X=μ(Xn)X = \bigcup\mu(X_n) and Y=λ(Yn)Y = \bigcup\lambda(Y_n) be disjoint unions of finite measure sets, using the σ\sigma-finiteness property.

Now define Qmn=Q(Xn×Ym)Q_{mn} = Q\cap(X_n\times Y_m) and let M\mathfrak{M} be the class of all QS×TQ\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} such that QmnΩQ_{mn}\in\Omega for all mm and nn. We show that M\mathscr{M} is monotonic and contains all elementary sets, hence M=S×T\mathfrak{M}=\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} (by fact 2 above).

Thus QmnΩQ_{mn}\in\Omega for every QS×TQ\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T} and for all mm and nn. We show that Ω\Omega is closed under countable disjoint unions and we are done.

Note that we went through QmnQ_{mn} because the proof (in Rudin) used the σ\sigma-finite property to guarantee an upper bound on the measure of the largest set in a descending chain of sets in Ω\Omega, which is necessary to use the dominated convergence theorem.

Hence we can define the product measure (on two σ\sigma-finite spaces) as (μ×λ)(Q)=Xλ(Qx) dμ(x)=Yμ(Qy) dλ(y)(QS×T).(\mu\times\lambda)(Q) = \int_X\lambda(Q_x)\ d\mu(x) = \int_Y\mu(Q^y)\ d\lambda(y)\qquad (Q\in\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T}).

Fubini's Theorem

We can now show the main result of the chapter:

Fubini's Theorem: Let (X,S,μ)(X, \mathscr{S}, \mu) and (Y,T,λ)(Y, \mathscr{T}, \lambda) be σ\sigma-finite measure spaces, and let ff be a (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})-measurable function on X×YX\times Y.

  • If 0f0\leq f\leq \infty, and if φ(x)=Yfx dλ,ψ(y)=Xfy dμ(xX,yY),\varphi(x)=\int_Y f_x\ d\lambda,\qquad \psi(y)=\int_X f^y\ d\mu\qquad (x\in X, y\in Y), then φ\varphi is S\mathscr{S}-measurable, ψ\psi is T\mathscr{T}-measurable, and Xφ dμ=X×Yf d(μ×λ)=Yψ dλ.\int_X\varphi\ d\mu = \int_{X\times Y} f\ d(\mu\times\lambda) = \int_Y\psi\ d\lambda.
  • If ff is complex and if φ(x)=Yfx dλ,Xφ dμ<,\varphi^*(x)=\int_Y |f|_x\ d\lambda,\qquad \int_X \varphi^*\ d\mu < \infty, then fL1(μ×λ)f\in L^1(\mu\times\lambda).
  • If fL1(μ×λ)f\in L^1(\mu\times\lambda), then fxL1(λ)f_x\in L^1(\lambda) for almost all xXx\in X, fyL1(μ)f^y\in L^1(\mu) for almost all yYy\in Y; the functions φ\varphi and ψ\psi defined earlier a.e. are in L1(μ)L^1(\mu) and L1(λ)L^1(\lambda) respectively, and the equality still holds.

This is proven using the previous theorem for non-negative simple functions, then extending it to the general case.

Counterexamples

Some counterexamples which occur when the conditions of the theorem are relaxed are instructive:

  • Let X=Y=[0,1]X=Y=[0,1] with the usual Lebesgue measure. Choose 0=δ1<δ2<,δn10 = \delta_1 < \delta_2 < \cdots, \delta_n \rightarrow 1, and let gng_n be a real continuous function with support in (δn,δn+1)(\delta_n, \delta_{n+1}), s.t. 01gn(t) dt=1\int_0^1 g_n(t)\ dt = 1. Define f(x,y)=n=1[gn(x)gn+1(x)]gn(y).f(x, y) = \sum_{n=1}^\infty [g_n(x) - g_{n+1}(x)] g_n(y). We may observe that 0101f(x,y) dy dx=10=0101f(x,y) dx dy,\int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x, y)\ dy\ dx = 1 \neq 0 = \int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x, y)\ dx\ dy, so the conclusion of Fubini's theorem fails. Note that 0101f(x,y) dy dx=.\int_0^1 \int_0^1 |f(x, y)|\ dy\ dx = \infty.
  • Let X=Y=[0,1]X=Y=[0,1] with the Lebesgue measure on XX and the counting measure on YY, the latter of which is not σ\sigma-finite. Put f(x,y)=1f(x, y) = 1 if x=yx = y and 0 otherwise. Then YXf(x,y) dμ(x) dλ(y)=01=XYf(x,y) dλ(y) dμ(x).\int_Y\int_X f(x, y)\ d\mu(x)\ d\lambda(y) = 0 \neq 1 = \int_X\int_Y f(x, y)\ d\lambda(y)\ d\mu(x). Note that our function ff is indeed (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})-measurable.
  • In both cases above, either the function or the space was 'too big'. We turn our focus to the measurability of ff. Once again, let X=Y=[0,1]X=Y=[0,1] with the Lebesgue measure, and assume the continuum hypothesis. There is a well-ordering jj of [0,1][0,1] s.t. each initial segment is countable. Let QQ be the set of all (x,y)(x, y) in the unit square s.t. xx precedes yy in the well-ordering. Thus QxQ_x contains all but countably many points of [0,1][0,1], and QyQ^y contains at most countably many points of [0,1][0,1]. Hence if f=χQf=\chi_Q, both fxf_x and fyf^y are Borel-measurable and 0101f(x,y) dy dx=10=0101f(x,y) dx dy.\int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x, y)\ dy\ dx = 1 \neq 0 = \int_0^1 \int_0^1 f(x, y)\ dx\ dy. Here both the function and the space are 'small', and fxf_x and fyf^y are measurable and the iterated integrals are finite, but ff is not (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})-measurable. Note that no reference to measurability w.r.t the product measure is needed to define the iterated integrals.

Completions of product measures

It is not necessarily the case that the product of two complete measures is complete. For instance, let AA be any one point in R\mathbb{R}, and let BB be any Lebesgue non-measurable set in R\mathbb{R}. Then A×BA×RA\times B\subset A\times \mathbb{R}, the latter of which has measure 0. However A×BA\times B is not (m1×m1)(m_1\times m_1)-measurable (because of Fact 1 above). Hence in particular, m1×m1m_1\times m_1 is not m2m_2.

However, we do have the following:

Completion of products of Lebesgue measures: Let mkm_k denote the Lebesgue measure on Rk\mathbb{R}^k. Then mr+sm_{r+s} is the completion of the product measure mr×msm_r \times m_s.

In view of this, we have an alternative statement of Fubini's theorem:

Fubini's Theorem: Let (X,S,μ)(X, \mathscr{S}, \mu) and (Y,T,λ)(Y, \mathscr{T}, \lambda) be σ\sigma-finite measure spaces, and let ff be a (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})^*-measurable function on X×YX\times Y, where the ^* denotes the completion. Then all the previous statements of Fubini's theorem hold, except that the measurability of fxf_x and fyf^y can only be asserted a.e. (instead of everywhere).

This is done by showing that for any M\mathfrak{M}^*-measurable function there is a M\mathfrak{M}-measurable function that is equal a.e., and if hh is a (S×T)(\mathscr{S}\times\mathscr{T})^*-measurable function that is 0 a.e. with respect the product measure, then for almost all xXx\in X, h(x,y)=0h(x, y) = 0 for almost all yy, and hxh_x is measurable for almost all xx, similarly for hyh^y.

Applications of Fubini's Theorem

We will quickly state some applications of Fubini's theorem without too much elaboration.

Convolutions: Suppose fL1(R)f\in L^1(\mathbb{R}), gL1(R)g\in L^1(\mathbb{R}). Then f(xy)g(y) dy<\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x-y)g(y)|\ dy < \infty for almost all xx. For this xx define h(x)=f(xy)g(y) dy<.h(x)=\int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x-y)g(y)|\ dy < \infty. Then hL1(R)h\in L^1(\mathbb{R}), and h1f1g1,\|h\|_1 \leq \|f\|_1\|g\|_1, where f1=f(x) dx.\|f\|_1 = \int_{-\infty}^\infty |f(x)|\ dx.

Distribution functions: Suppose that f:X[0,]f: X\rightarrow [0,\infty] is measurable and μ\mu is a σ\sigma-finite positive measure on XX. Let φ:[0,][0,]\varphi:[0,\infty]\rightarrow [0,\infty] is monotonic, absolutely continuous on [0,T][0, T] for every T<T<\infty, and that φ(0)=0\varphi(0)=0 and φ(t)φ()\varphi(t)\rightarrow\varphi(\infty) as tt\rightarrow\infty. Then X(φf) dμ=0μ{f>t}φ(t) dt\int_X (\varphi\circ f)\ d\mu = \int_0^\infty \mu\{f > t\}\varphi'(t)\ dt where once again μ{f>t}=μ({xX:f(x)>t})\mu\{f>t\} = \mu(\{x\in X: f(x) > t\}).

Here uniform continuity was used to use the fundamental theorem of calculus.

Let MfMf denote the maximal function of ff. Recall that MfMf lies in weak L1L^1 when fL1(Rk)f\in L^1(\mathbb{R}^k). We also have that Mff\|Mf\|_\infty \leq \|f\|_\infty for all fL(Rk)f\in L^\infty(\mathbb{R}^k). As for the rest:

Maximal functions: If 1<p<1 < p < \infty and fLp(Rk)f\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^k) then MfLp(Rk)Mf\in L^p(\mathbb{R}^k).

This uses the previous theorem to calculate some tail bounds.