Notes on Chapter 8 (Integration on Product Spaces) of Walter Rudin's Real and Complex Analysis.
This chapter is primarily concerned with Fubini's theorem and some of its applications. We begin with some preliminaries.
Preliminaries
Measurability on Cartesian Products
Let (X,S), (Y,T) be measurable spaces.
A couple of definitions:
- A measurable rectangle is a set of the form A×B with both A and B measurable.
- The class E of elementary sets consists of all finite unions of disjoint measurable rectangles.
- S×T is the smallest σ-algebra in X×Y which contains every measurable rectangle.
- A monotone class M is a collection of sets such that if Ai∈M and Ai⊂Ai+1, then the countable union of the Ai is in M, and where the opposite is true for the intersection of a descending chain of sets.
- If E⊂X×Y, define the x- and y-section
Ex={y:(x,y)∈E},Ey={x:(x,y)∈E}.
- If f:X×Y→Z, define fx(y)=f(x,y)=fy(x).
We can prove a few basic facts:
Facts about products:
- If E∈S×T then Ex∈T and Ey∈S for any x∈X and y∈Y.
- S×T is the smallest monotone class which contains E.
- If f is (S×T)-measurable then fx is T-measurable and fy is S-measurable for any x∈X and y∈Y. □
Product Measures
We use the following theorem to justify our definition of product measures:
Well-definedness of product measures: Let (X,S,μ) and (Y,T,λ) be σ-finite measure spaces. Suppose Q∈S×T. Define
φ(x)=λ(Qx),ψ(y)=μ(Qy)
then φ is S-measurable, ψ is T-measurable, and
∫Xφ dμ=∫Yψ dλ. □
We show this by setting Ω to be the class of all Q∈S×T that satisfy the conclusion of the theorem. Let X=⋃μ(Xn) and Y=⋃λ(Yn) be disjoint unions of finite measure sets, using the σ-finiteness property.
Now define
Qmn=Q∩(Xn×Ym)
and let M be the class of all Q∈S×T such that Qmn∈Ω for all m and n. We show that M is monotonic and contains all elementary sets, hence M=S×T (by fact 2 above).
Thus Qmn∈Ω for every Q∈S×T and for all m and n. We show that Ω is closed under countable disjoint unions and we are done.
Note that we went through Qmn because the proof (in Rudin) used the σ-finite property to guarantee an upper bound on the measure of the largest set in a descending chain of sets in Ω, which is necessary to use the dominated convergence theorem.
Hence we can define the product measure (on two σ-finite spaces) as
(μ×λ)(Q)=∫Xλ(Qx) dμ(x)=∫Yμ(Qy) dλ(y)(Q∈S×T).
Fubini's Theorem
We can now show the main result of the chapter:
Fubini's Theorem: Let (X,S,μ) and (Y,T,λ) be σ-finite measure spaces, and let f be a (S×T)-measurable function on X×Y.
- If 0≤f≤∞, and if
φ(x)=∫Yfx dλ,ψ(y)=∫Xfy dμ(x∈X,y∈Y),
then φ is S-measurable, ψ is T-measurable, and
∫Xφ dμ=∫X×Yf d(μ×λ)=∫Yψ dλ.
- If f is complex and if
φ∗(x)=∫Y∣f∣x dλ,∫Xφ∗ dμ<∞,
then f∈L1(μ×λ).
- If f∈L1(μ×λ), then fx∈L1(λ) for almost all x∈X, fy∈L1(μ) for almost all y∈Y; the functions φ and ψ defined earlier a.e. are in L1(μ) and L1(λ) respectively, and the equality still holds. □
This is proven using the previous theorem for non-negative simple functions, then extending it to the general case.
Counterexamples
Some counterexamples which occur when the conditions of the theorem are relaxed are instructive:
- Let X=Y=[0,1] with the usual Lebesgue measure. Choose 0=δ1<δ2<⋯,δn→1, and let gn be a real continuous function with support in (δn,δn+1), s.t. ∫01gn(t) dt=1. Define
f(x,y)=n=1∑∞[gn(x)−gn+1(x)]gn(y).
We may observe that
∫01∫01f(x,y) dy dx=1=0=∫01∫01f(x,y) dx dy,
so the conclusion of Fubini's theorem fails. Note that
∫01∫01∣f(x,y)∣ dy dx=∞.
- Let X=Y=[0,1] with the Lebesgue measure on X and the counting measure on Y, the latter of which is not σ-finite. Put f(x,y)=1 if x=y and 0 otherwise. Then
∫Y∫Xf(x,y) dμ(x) dλ(y)=0=1=∫X∫Yf(x,y) dλ(y) dμ(x).
Note that our function f is indeed (S×T)-measurable.
- In both cases above, either the function or the space was 'too big'. We turn our focus to the measurability of f. Once again, let X=Y=[0,1] with the Lebesgue measure, and assume the continuum hypothesis. There is a well-ordering j of [0,1] s.t. each initial segment is countable. Let Q be the set of all (x,y) in the unit square s.t. x precedes y in the well-ordering. Thus Qx contains all but countably many points of [0,1], and Qy contains at most countably many points of [0,1]. Hence if f=χQ, both fx and fy are Borel-measurable and
∫01∫01f(x,y) dy dx=1=0=∫01∫01f(x,y) dx dy.
Here both the function and the space are 'small', and fx and fy are measurable and the iterated integrals are finite, but f is not (S×T)-measurable. Note that no reference to measurability w.r.t the product measure is needed to define the iterated integrals.
Completions of product measures
It is not necessarily the case that the product of two complete measures is complete. For instance, let A be any one point in R, and let B be any Lebesgue non-measurable set in R. Then A×B⊂A×R, the latter of which has measure 0. However A×B is not (m1×m1)-measurable (because of Fact 1 above). Hence in particular, m1×m1 is not m2.
However, we do have the following:
Completion of products of Lebesgue measures: Let mk denote the Lebesgue measure on Rk. Then mr+s is the completion of the product measure mr×ms. □
In view of this, we have an alternative statement of Fubini's theorem:
Fubini's Theorem: Let (X,S,μ) and (Y,T,λ) be σ-finite measure spaces, and let f be a (S×T)∗-measurable function on X×Y, where the ∗ denotes the completion. Then all the previous statements of Fubini's theorem hold, except that the measurability of fx and fy can only be asserted a.e. (instead of everywhere). □
This is done by showing that for any M∗-measurable function there is a M-measurable function that is equal a.e., and if h is a (S×T)∗-measurable function that is 0 a.e. with respect the product measure, then for almost all x∈X, h(x,y)=0 for almost all y, and hx is measurable for almost all x, similarly for hy.
Applications of Fubini's Theorem
We will quickly state some applications of Fubini's theorem without too much elaboration.
Convolutions: Suppose f∈L1(R), g∈L1(R). Then
∫−∞∞∣f(x−y)g(y)∣ dy<∞
for almost all x. For this x define
h(x)=∫−∞∞∣f(x−y)g(y)∣ dy<∞.
Then h∈L1(R), and
∥h∥1≤∥f∥1∥g∥1,
where
∥f∥1=∫−∞∞∣f(x)∣ dx. □
Distribution functions: Suppose that f:X→[0,∞] is measurable and μ is a σ-finite positive measure on X. Let φ:[0,∞]→[0,∞] is monotonic, absolutely continuous on [0,T] for every T<∞, and that φ(0)=0 and φ(t)→φ(∞) as t→∞. Then
∫X(φ∘f) dμ=∫0∞μ{f>t}φ′(t) dt
where once again μ{f>t}=μ({x∈X:f(x)>t}). □
Here uniform continuity was used to use the fundamental theorem of calculus.
Let Mf denote the maximal function of f. Recall that Mf lies in weak L1 when f∈L1(Rk). We also have that ∥Mf∥∞≤∥f∥∞ for all f∈L∞(Rk). As for the rest:
Maximal functions: If 1<p<∞ and f∈Lp(Rk) then Mf∈Lp(Rk). □
This uses the previous theorem to calculate some tail bounds.